BuddhaSasana Home Page
Fundamental of
Vipassana
Mahasi Sayadaw
translated by Maung
Tha Noe
Calm and Insight What do we meditate on? How do we develop
insight? This is a very important question. There are two kinds of meditation:
meditating to develop calm and meditating to develop insight. Meditating
on the ten devices only gives rise to calm, not insight. Meditating on the
ten foul things (a swollen corpse, for example), too, only gives rise to
calm, not insight. The ten recollections, like remembering the Buddha, the
Law and others, too, can develop calm and not insight. Meditating on the
thirty-two parts of the body like hair, nails, teeth, skin -- these too,
are not insight. They develop only concentration. Mindfulness as to respiration is also
concentration-developing. But one can develop insight from it.
Visuddhi-Magga, however, includes it in the concentration subjects and
so we will call it as such here. Then there are the four divine states,
love, pity, sympathetic joy, and equanimity, and four formless states
leading to formless jhanas. Then, there is the meditation on the
loathsomeness of food. All these are subjects for concentration
meditation. When you meditate on the four elements
inside your body, it is called the analysis of the four elements. Although
this is a concentration meditation, it helps develop insight as well. All these forty subjects of meditation are
subjects for developing concentration. Only respiration and analysis of
elements have to do with insight. The others will not give rise to
insight. If you want insight, you will have to work further. To come back to our question, how do we
develop insight? The answer is: we develop insight by meditating on the
five aggregates of grasping. The mental and material qualities inside
beings are aggregates of grasping. They may be grasped with delight by
craving in which case it is called "grasping of the sense objects" -- or
they may be grasped wrongly by wrong views -- in which case it is called
"grasping through wrong views." You have to meditate on them and see them
as they really are. If you don't, you will grasp them with craving and
wrong views. Once you see them as they are, you no longer grasp them. In
this way you develop insight. We will discuss the five aggregates of
grasping in detail. Aggregates The five aggregates of grasping are matter
or form, feelings, perception, volitional activities and consciousness.
What are they? They are the things you experience all the time. You do not
have to go anywhere else to find them. They are in you. When you see, they
are there in the seeing. When you hear, they are there in the hearing.
When you smell, taste, touch, or think, they are there in the smelling,
tasting, touching or thinking. When you bend, stretch or move your limbs,
the aggregates are there in the bending, stretching or moving. Only you do
not know them to be aggregates. It is because you have not meditated on
them and so do not know them as they really are. Not knowing them as they
are, you grasp them with craving and wrong view. What happens when you bend? It begins with
the intention to bend. Then come the forms of bending one by one. Now in
the intention to bend there are the four mental aggregates. The mind that
intends to bend is the cons-ciousness. When you think of bending and then
bend, you may feel happy, or unhappy, or neither happy nor unhappy, doing
so. If you bend with happiness, there is pleasant feeling. If you bend
with unhappiness or anger, there is unpleasant feeling. If you bend with
neither happiness nor unhappiness, there is neutral feeling. So, when you
think of bending, there is the "feeling" aggregate. Then, there is
perception, the aggregate that recognizes the bending. Then there is the
mental state that urges you to bend. It seems as though it were saying
"Bend! Bend!" It is the volitional activities. Thus, in the intention to
bend you have feelings, perception, volitional activities and
consciousness -- all four mental aggregates. The movement of bending is
matter or form. It is the material aggregate. So, the intention to bend
and the bending together make up the five aggregates. Thus, in one bending of the arm, there are
the five aggregates. You move once and the five aggregates come up. You
move again and there are more of the five aggregates. Every move calls up
the five aggregates. If you have not meditated on them rightly and have
not known them rightly, what happens we need not tell you. You know for
yourselves. Well, you think "I intend to bend" and "I
bend", don't you? Everybody does. Ask the children, they will give the
same answer. Ask adults who can't read and write, the same answer. Ask
someone who can read, the same answer still if he will say what he has in
his mind. But, because he is well-read, he may invent answers to suit the
scriptures and say "Mind and matter." It is not what he knows for himself.
Only inventions to suit the scriptures. In his heart of hearts he is
thinking: "It is I who intend to bend. It is I who bend. It is I who
intend to move. It is I who move." He also thinks: "This I have been
before, am now, and will be in the future. I exist for ever." This
thinking is called the notion of permanence. Nobody thinks, "This
intention to bend exists only now." Ordinary people always think, "This
mind existed before. The same that have existed before am now thinking of
bending." They also think, "This thinking I exist now and will go on
existing." When you bend or move the limbs, you
think: "It is the same limbs that have existed that are moving now. It
is the same I that have existed that am moving now." After moving you
again think, "These limbs, this I, always exist." It never occurs to you
that they pass away. This, too, is the notion of permanence. It is
clinging to what is impermanent as permanent, clinging to what is no
personality, no ego, as personality, as ego. Then, as you have bent or stretched to
your desire, you think it is very nice. For example, as you feel stiffness
in the arm, you move or rearrange it and the stiffness is gone. You feel
comfortable. You think it is very nice. You think it is happiness. Dancers
and amateur dancers bend and stretch as they dance and think it is very
nice to do so. They delight in it and are pleased with themselves. When
you converse among yourselves you often shake your hands and heads and are
pleased. You think it is happiness. When something you are doing meets
with success, again you think it is good, it is happiness. This is how you
delight through craving and cling to things. What is impermanent you take
to be permanent and delight in. What is not happiness, not personality,
but just aggregates of mind and matter, you take to be happiness, or
personality, and delight in. You delight in them and cling to them. You
mistake them for self or ego and cling to them, too. So, when you bend, stretch or move your
limbs, the thinking "I will bend" is aggregate of grasping. The bending is
the aggregate of grasping. The thinking "I will stretch" is the aggregate
of grasping. The stretching is the aggregate of grasping. The thinking "I
will move" is the aggregate of grasping. The moving is the aggregate of
grasping. When we speak of aggregates of grasping to be meditated on, we
mean just these things. The same thing happens in seeing, hearing,
etc. When you see, the seat of seeing, the eye, is manifest. So is the
object seen. Both are material things. They cannot cognize. But if one
fails to meditate while seeing, one grasps them. One thinks the whole body
with the eye is permanent, happy, self, and grasps it. One thinks the
whole material world with the object seen is permanent, beautiful, good,
happy, and. self, and grasps it. So the form eye and the form visible
object are aggregates of grasping. And when you see, the "seeing" is
manifest, too. It is the four mental aggregates. The mere awareness of
seeing is the aggregate consciousness. Pleasure or displeasure at seeing
is the aggregate feeling. What perceives the object seen is the aggregate
perception. What brings the attention to see is the aggregate volitional
activities. They constitute the four mental aggregates. If one fails to
meditate while seeing, one is inclined to think that seeing "has existed
before, and exists now." Or, as one sees good things, one may think
"seeing is good." So thinking, one goes after good and strange things to
enjoy seeing. One goes to watch plays and films at the expense of money,
sleep and health because one thinks it is good to do so. If one does not
think it is good, one will not go to waste money or impair one's health.
To think that what sees or enjoys is "I", "I am enjoying", is to grasp
with craving and wrong view. Because they grasp, the mind and matter that
manifest themselves in seeing are said to be aggregates of grasping. You grasp in the same way in hearing,
smelling, tasting, touching or thinking. You grasp all the more to the
mind that thinks, imagines and reflects as being the "I", the ego. So, the
five aggregates of grasping are none other than the mental-material things
that manifest themselves at the six doors whenever one sees, hears, feels
or perceives. You must try to see these aggregates as they are. To
meditate on them and see them as they are -- that is insight knowledge. Knowledge and Freedom "Insight meditation is meditating on the
five aggregates of grasping." This is in accordance with the teachings of
the Buddha. The teachings of the Buddha are called suttas, which
means "thread." When a carpenter is about to plane down or saw off a piece
of timber he draws a straight line using a thread. In the same way when we
want to live the holy life we use the "thread" or sutta to
draw straight lines in our actions. The Buddha has given us lines or
instructions on how to train in morality, develop concentration and make
become wisdom. You cannot go out of the line and speak or act as you
please. Regarding the meditation of the five aggregates, here are a few
excerpts from the suttas: "Material shape, monks, is impermanent.
What is impermanent, that is suffering. What is suffering, that is not the
self. What is not self, that is not mine, that am I not, this is not my
self. As it really comes to be, one should discern it thus by right
wisdom." -- Samyutta Nikaya ii 19
You must meditate so that you will realize
this impermanent, suffering, not-self material form is really impermanent,
dreadfully suffering, and without a self or ego. You should meditate
likewise on feelings, perception, activities, and consciousness.
What is the use of looking upon
these aggregates as impermanent, suffering and not-self? The Buddha tells us: "So seeing all these things, the
instructed disciple of the Aryans disregards material shape, disregards
feeling." -- Samyutta Nikaya iii
68 He who realizes the impermanent,
suffering, not-self nature of the five aggregates is wearied of material
form as he is of feelings, perception, activities and consciousness. "By disregarding he is passionless." That is to say, he has reached the Ariyan
Path. "Through passionlessness, he is freed." Once he has reached the Ariyan path of
passionlessness, he has arrived at the four fruitions of freedom from the
defilements, too. "In freedom the knowledge comes to be 'I
am freed.' " When you are freed, you know for yourself
that you are so. In other words, when you have become an arahat in
whom the defilements are extinguished, you know you have become one. All these excerpts are from Yad anicca
Sutta and there are numerous suttas of this kind. The whole
Khandhavagga Samyutta is a collection of them. Two suttas are
especially noteworthy: Silavanta Sutta and Sutavanta Sutta.
In both suttas the venerable Maha Kotthika puts some questions to the
venerable Sariputta, who gives very brief but vivid answers. Maha Kotthika
asks: "What things, friend Sariputta, should be
attended to thoroughly by a monk of moral habit?" Note the attribute "of moral habit" in
this question. If you want to practise insight meditation with a view to
attaining the Path and Fruition and Nirvana, the least qualification you
need is to be of moral habit. If you don 't even have moral habit, you
can't hope for the higher conditions of concentration and wisdom. The
Venerable. Sariputta answers: "The five grasping aggregates, friend
Kotthika, are the things which should be thoroughly attended to by a monk
of moral habit, as being impermanent, suffering, as a disease, as a boil,
as a dart, as pain, as illness, as alien, as decay, as void, as not-self." What is the good of meditating like that?
In answer the Venerable Sariputta goes on, "Indeed, friend, it is possible for a monk
of moral habit so thoroughly attending to these five aggregates of
grasping" to realize the fruits of
stream-winning.
So, if you want to be a stream
winner and never to be reborn in the four lower states, you have to
meditate on the five aggregates to realize their impermanence, suffering,
and not-self nature. But that is not all. You can become an Arahat, too.
The venerable Kotthika goes on to ask, "What things, friend Sariputta, should be
attended to thoroughly by a monk who is a Stream-winner?" The Venerable Sariputta answers that it is
the same five aggregates of grasping that should be thoroughly attended to
by a stream-winner, as impermanent, suffering, not-self. The result? He
moves on to Once-returning. What does Once-returner meditate on? Again the
same five aggregates of grasping. He then becomes a Non-returner. What
does the Non-returner meditate on? The five aggregates again. Now he
becomes an Arahat. What does the Arahat meditate on? The five aggregates
again. From this it is clear that the five aggregates are the things one
has to meditate on even when one has become an Arahat. What good is it to the Arahat by
meditating so? Will he become a silent Buddha? Or, a supreme Buddha? No,
neither. He will end his round of rebirths as an Arahat and enter Nirvana.
The Arahat has no defilement left unremoved or uncalmed yet. All the
defilements have been removed and calmed. So, he has nothing to develop in
order to remove the defilements left unremoved or to calm those left
uncalmed. Neither has he any moral habit, con-centration or wisdom yet to
perfect. All the moral habits, concentration and wisdom that ought to be
perfected have been perfected in him. So, he has no need to work for the
perfection of what ought to be perfected, nor has he any need to increase
those already perfected. The insight practice brings no such benefits to
the Arahat. One of the benefits the Arahat receives by
meditating on the five aggregates is the happy condition in this world.
Notwithstanding his being an Arahat, if he remains without meditation,
disquiet and discomfort keep coming up at the six sense-doors, now here,
now there. Here, disquiet does not mean mental distress. As the
sense-objects keep coming up despite himself, he finds no peace of mind.
That is all. Not to speak of Arahats, our meditators of today feel ill at
ease to meet with the sense-objects, eager though they are on insight. As
they return home from the meditation centre, they see this thing, hear
that thing, get engaged in such and such business talks, and there is no
peace at all. So they come back to the centre. To some, however, the
disquiet does not last very long. Just four, five or ten days. Very soon
the homely spirit gets the better of them and they are happy with their
home life and set to household cares again. The arahat never returns to
his old habits. If he meets with various sense-objects without meditation,
only disquiet results. Only when he is absorbed in insight meditation does
he find peace of mind. Thus meditating on the five grasping aggregates
brings to the Arahat a happy condition in this world. Again, as he lives in earnest meditation,
mindfulness and comprehension of the impermanence, suffering and not-self
keep rising in him. This is another benefit. The Arahat in whom
mindfulness and comprehension keep rising is said to be in a chronic state
of life. Such a one can enjoy the attainment to fruition at any
time and for as long as he desires. For these two benefits -- a happy
condition in this world and mindfulness-comprehension -- the Arahat lives
in meditation. The above are the answers given by the
venerable Sariputta in Silavanta Sutta. The same answers are found
in Sutavanta Sutta too. The only difference is in the terms
silavanta, "of moral habit" or "virtuous", and sutavanta,
"instructed" or "well informed." All the other words are the same. Based
on these two suttas and other suttas on the aggregate the dictum has been
formulated: Insight knowledge comes
from meditating on the five aggregates of grasping.
Now to come back to the grasping that
rises through the six sense-doors. When people see, they think of themselves
or others as being permanent, as having existed before, as existing now,
as going to exist in future, as existing always. They think of them as
being happy, good, or beautiful. They think of them as being living
entities. They think likewise when they hear, smell, taste or touch. This
"touch" is widespread all over the body -- wherever there is flesh and
blood. And wherever touch arises, there arises
grasping. The bending, stretching, or moving of the limbs mentioned
earlier are all instances of touch. So are the tense movements of rising
and falling in the abdomen. We will come to this in detail later. When one thinks or imagines, one thinks,
"The I that have existed before is now thinking. Thinking, I go on
existing," and so one thinks of oneself as being permanent, as an ego. One
also thinks the thinking or imagining as being enjoyable, as being very
nice. One thinks it is happiness. If told that the thinking will disappear,
he cannot accept it. He is not pleased. This is because he is clinging to
it. In this way one clings to whatever comes
through the six sense doors, as being permanent, as being happy, as ego,
as self. One delights with craving and clings to it. One mistakes with
wrong view and clings to it. You have to meditate on the five
aggregates that can cling or grasp. The Right Method When you meditate, you have to meditate
with method. Only the right method can bring about insight. If you look
upon things as being permanent, how can there be insight? If you
look upon them as being happy, beautiful, as soul, as ego, how can
there be insight? Mind and matter are impermanent things.
These impermanent things you have to meditate on to see them as they
really are, as being impermanent. They rise and pass away and keep on
oppressing you, so they are dreadful, they are sufferings. You have to
meditate to see them as they are, as sufferings. They are processes
lacking in a personality, a soul, a self. You have to meditate to see that
there is no personality, no soul, no self. You must try to see them as
they really are. So, every time you see, hear, touch or
perceive, you must try to see the mental and material processes that rise
through the six sense doors as they really are. When you see, the
seeing is real. This you must note seeing, seeing. In the same way
when you hear, note hearing. When you smell, note smelling.
When you taste, note tasting. When you touch, note touching.
Tiredness, hotness, aches, and such unbearable and unpleasant sensations
arise from contact too. Observe them: tiredness, hot, pain, and so
on. Thoughts, ideas, may also turn up. Note them: thinking, imagining,
pleasure, delight, as they arise. But to the novice it is hard to observe
all that come up through the six sense doors. He must begin with just a
few. You meditate like this. When you breathe
in and out, the way the abdomen moves rising and falling is especially
conspicuous. You begin observing this move-ment. The movement of rising
you observe as rising. The movement of falling you observe as
falling. This observation of rising and falling is void of the lingo
of the scriptures. People who are not used to meditational practice speak
of it in contempt: "This rising and falling business has nothing to do
with the scriptures. It is nothing." Well may they think it is nothing
because it is not done up in scriptural jargon. Theoretically, however, it is
something. The rising is real, the falling is real, the moving air element
is real. We have used the colloquial words rising and falling
for convenience's sake. In scriptural terminology, the rising-falling
is the air-element. If you observe the abdomen attentively as it rises and
falls, the firmness is there, the motion is there, the bringing out is
there. Here, the "firmness" is the characteristic of the air-element, the
motion is its property, and the bringing out is its manifestation. To know
the air-element as it really is means to know its characteristic, property
and manifes-tation. We meditate to know them. Insight begins with the
determination of mind and matter. To achieve this the meditator begins
with the matter. How? "(The meditator) should.... seize by way
of characteristic, function and so on." -- Visuddhi-magga ii 227 When you begin meditating on matter or
mind, you should do so by way of either the characteristic or the property
(function). "And so on" refers to the manifesta-tion (mode of appearance).
In this connection the Compendium of Philosophy is quite to the point. "Purity of view is the understanding of
mind and matter with respect to their characteristics, function
(property), mode of appearance (manifestation) and proximate cause." The meaning is this: insight begins with
the analytical knowledge of mind and matter. In the seven purities, first
you perfect the purity of morals and the purity of mind, and then you
begin the purity of views. To achieve the analytical knowledge of mind and
matter and the purity of views, you have to meditate on mind and matter
and know them by way of their characteristics, property (function),
manifestation and proximate cause. Once you know them thus, you gain the
analytical knowledge of mind and matter. Once this knowledge grows
sharper, you develop the purity of views. Here, "to know them by way of their
characteristics" means to know the intrinsic nature of mind and matter. To
know "by way of property" is to know their function. Manifestation is
their mode of appearance. It is not yet necessary to know the proximate
cause at the initial stage of meditational practice. So we will just go on
to explain the characteristics, function and manifestation. In both the Path of Purity and the
Compendium of Philosophy just quoted it is not indicated that mind
and matter should be meditated on by name, by number, as material
particles or as incessantly coming up processes. It is only shown that
they should be meditated on by way of their characteristics, function and
manifestation. One should take careful note of this. If not, one can be
led to concepts of names, numbers, particles or processes. The
commentaries say that you should meditate on mind and matter by way of
their characteristic, function and manifestation, and so when you meditate
on the air element, you do so by way of its characteristic, function and
manifestation. What is the characteristic of the air-element? It is
the characteristic of support. This is its intrinsic nature. It is the air
element itself. What is the function of the air-element? It is moving.
What is its manifestation? It is bringing out. Manifestation is what
appears to the meditator's intellect. As one meditates on the air-element,
it appears to the meditator's intellect as something bringing out,
pushing, and pulling. This is the manifestation of the air-element. As
you meditate on the rising-falling of the abdomen, all the firmness,
moving, bringing out, become clear to you. These are the characteristic,
function and manifestation of the air-element. This air element is
important. In the postures and comprehension, contemplation of the body,
Satipatthana-sutta, the commentator has laid emphasis on the
air-element. Here is the Buddha's teaching: "Gacchanto va gacchami ti pajanati."
The Buddha is instructing us to be mindful
of the form walking by noting walking, walking, every time we walk.
How knowledge is developed from meditating
thus is explained by the commentator: "The thought I am walking arises. This
produces air. The air produces the intimation. The bringing forward of the
whole body as the air-element spreads is said to be walking." The meaning is this: The meditator who is
used to meditating -- walking, walking, every time he walks
realizes like this. First the idea "I will walk" arises. This intention
gives rise to tense movement all over the body, which in turn causes the
material body to move forward move by move. This we say "I walk," or "He
walks." In reality there is no I or He that walks. Only the intention to
walk and the form walking. This the meditator realizes. Here, in this
explanation of the Commentary, the emphasis is on the realization of the
moving of the air-element. So, if you understand the air-element by way of
its characteristics, function and manifestation, you can decide for
yourself whether your meditation is right or not. The air-element has the characteristic of
support. In a football it is air that fills and supports so that the ball
expands and remains firm. In colloquial speech we say the ball is full and
firm. In philosophical terms the air-element is in support. When you
stretch your arm you feel some stiffness there. It is the air-element in
support. In the same way when you press an air-pillow or mattress with
your body or head, your body or head will not come down but stay high
above. It is because the air clement in the pillow or mattress is
supporting you. Bricks pile up as the ones below support those above. If
the bricks below are not supporting, the ones above will tumble down. In
the same way the human body is full of the air-element which gives support
to it so that it can stand stiff and firm. We say "firm" relatively. If
there is something firmer, we will call it "lax". If there is something
more lax, it becomes firm again. The function of the air-element is moving.
It moves from place to place when it is strong. It is the air-element that
makes the body bend, stretch, sit, rise, go or come. Those unpractised in
insight meditation often say, "If you note bending, stretching,
only concepts like arms will appear to you. If you note left,
right, only concepts like legs will appear to you. If you note
rising, falling, only concepts like the abdomen will appear to you."
This may be true to some of the beginners. But it is not true to think
that the concepts will keep coming up. Both concepts and realities appear
to the beginner. Some people instruct the beginners to meditate on
realities only. This is impossible. To forget concepts is quite
impracticable at the beginning. You must combine concepts with realities.
The Buddha himself used concepts and told us to be "aware 'I am walking' "
when we walk, bend or stretch. He did not use realities and tell us to be
"aware 'It is supporting, moving'," etc. Although you meditate using the
language of concepts like "walking, bending, stretching," as your
mindfulness and concentration grow stronger, all the concepts disappear
and only the realities like support and moving appear to you. When you
reach the stage of the knowledge of dissolution, although you meditate
walking, walking, neither the legs nor the body appear to you.
Only the movement itself is there. Although you meditate bending,
bending, there will not be any arms or legs. Only the movement.
Although you meditate rising, falling, there will be no image of
the abdomen or the body. Only the movement out and in. These as well as
swaying are functions of the air-element. What appears to be bringing out or drawing
in to the meditator's mind is the manifestation of the air-element. When
you bend or stretch your arm, it appears, something is drawing it in or
pushing it out. It is plainer when walking. To the meditator whose
concentration is grown sharper, by noting walking, right step, left
step, lifting, putting forward, putting down, this moving forward
as if being driven from behind becomes quite plain. The legs seem to be
pushing forward of their own accord. How they move forward without the
meditator making any effort is very plain. It is so good walking noting
like this that some spend a lot of time in it. So, when you meditate on the air element,
you should know it by way of its characteristic of supporting, its
function of moving, and its manifestation of bringing out. Only then is
your knowledge right and as it should be. You may ask, "Are we to meditate only
after learning the characteristic, function and manifestation?" No. You
need not learn them. If you meditate on the rising mind-and-matter, you
know the characteristic, the function, and the manifestation as well.
There is no other way than knowing by way of the characteristic, function,
and manifestation when you meditate on the rising mind-and-matter. When
you look up to the sky on a rainy day you see a flash of lightning. This
bright light is the characteristic of the lightning. As lightning flashes,
darkness is dispelled. This dispelling of darkness is the functions of
lightning, its work. You also see what it is like -- whether it is long,
short, a curve, a circle, straight, or vast. You see its characteristic,
its function, its manifesta-tion, all at once. Only you may not be able to
say the brightness is its characteristic, dispelling of darkness is its
function, or its shape or outline is its manifestation. But you see them
all the same. In the same way, when you meditate on the
rising mind-and-matter, you know its characteristic, its function, its
manifestation, everything. You need not learn them. Some learned persons
think that you have to learn them before you meditate. Not so. What you
learn are only concepts. Not realities. The meditator who is contemplating
the rising mind-and-matter knows them as if he were touching them with his
own hand. He needs not learn about them. If there is the elephant before
your very eyes, you need not look at the picture of an elephant. The meditator who is meditating on the
rising and falling of the abdomen knows the firmness or laxity thereof --
its characteristic. He knows the moving in or out -- its function. He also
knows its bringing in and pushing out --its manifestation. If he knows
these things as they really are, does he need to learn about them? Not if
he wants the realization for himself. But if he wants to preach to others,
he will need to learn about them. When you meditate right step, left
step, you know the tenseness in every step -- its characteristic. You
know the moving about-- its function. And you know its bringing out -- its
manifestation. This is proper knowledge, the right knowledge. Now, to know for yourselves how one can
discern the characteristic and so on by just meditating on what rises, try
doing some meditation. You certainly have some hotness, pain, tiredness,
ache, somewhere in your body now. These are unpleasant feelings hard to
bear. Concentrate on this unpleasantness with your intellect and
note hot, hot, or pain, pain. You will find that you
are going through an unpleasant experience and suffering. This is the
characteristic of suffering -- going through an unplea-sant experience. When this unpleasant feeling comes about,
you become low-spirited. If the unpleasantness is little, there is a
little low-spiritedness. If it is great, then low-spiritedness is great
too. Even those who are of a strong will have their spirits go low if the
unpleasant feelings are intense. Once you are very tired, you can't even
move. This making the spirit go low is the function of unpleasant feeling.
We have said "spirit"-- the mind. When the mind is low, its concomitants
get low too. The manifestation of unpleasant feeling is
physical oppression. It manifests itself as a physical affliction,
something unbearable to the meditator's intellect. As he meditates hot,
hot, pain, pain, it comes up to him as something oppressing in the
body, something very hard to bear. It shows up so much that you have to
groan. If you meditate on the unpleasant feeling in your body as it rises,
you know the undergoing of undesirable tangible object its characteristic,
the waning of associated states -- its function, and the physical
affliction -- its manifestation. This is the way the meditators gain
knowledge. The Mind You can meditate on mind, too. Mind
cognizes and thinks. So what thinks and imagines is mind. Meditate on this
mind as thinking, imagining, pondering, whenever it arises. You
will find that it has the intrinsic nature of going to the object,
cognizing the object. This is the characteristic of mind, as it is said,
"Mind has the characteristic of cognizing." Every kind of mind cognizes.
The conscious-ness of seeing cognizes the object, as do the consciousness
of hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, and thinking. When you work in collective, you have a
leader. Consciousness is the leader that cognizes the object that appears
at any sense door. When the visible object comes up to the eye,
consciousness cognizes it first of all. It is then followed by feeling,
perception, desire, delight, dislike, admiration and so on. In the same
way, when the audible object comes up to the ear, it is consciousness that
cognizes it first. It is more obvious when you think or imagine. If an
idea comes up while you are meditating "rising", "falling" etc, you
have to note the idea. If you can note it the moment it appears, it
disappears immediately. If you can't, several of its followers like
delight, desire, will come in succession. Then the meditator realizes how
consciousness is the leader -- its function. "Mind precedes things."
--Dhammapada If you note consciousness whenever it
rises, you see very clearly how it is acting as leader, now going to this
object now going to that object. Again it is said in the commentary:
"Consciousness has the manifestation of continuity." As you meditate
rising, falling, etc., the mind sometimes wanders away. You note it
and it disappears. Then another consciousness comes up. You note it and it
disappears. Again another consciousness appears. Again you note it and
again it disappears. Again another comes up. You have to note lots of such
comings up and goings away of consciousness. The meditator comes to
realize: "Consciousness is a succession of events that come up and go away
one after another. When one disappears, another appears." Thus you realize
the continuous manifestation of consciousness. The meditator who realizes
this also realizes death and birth. "Death is nothing strange after all.
It is just like the passing away of the consciousness I have been noting.
To be born again is like the coming up of the consciousness I am now
noting that has risen in continuation of the one preceding it". To show that one can understand the
characteristic, function and manifestation of things even though one has
not learnt about them, we have taken the air-element out of the material
qualities and the unpleasant feeling and consciousness out of the mental
qualities. You just have to meditate on them as they arise. The same
applies to all the other mental and material qualities. If you meditate on
them as they arise, you will understand their characteristics, function
and manifestation. The beginner in meditation can meditate on and
understand the mental-material aggregates of grasping only by way of these
characteristics, function and manifestation. At the initial stage with the
analytical knowledge of mind and matter and the knowledge by discerning
conditionality, which are elemental in insight meditation, understanding
that much is enough. When you come to real insight knowledges like the
knowledge of investigation, you know the characteristics, impermanence,
suffering, and not self as well. What time? The question now arises: What do we
meditate on the grasping aggregates for? And, as regards time, what time
do we meditate on, the past, the future, the present, or indefinite time? What do we meditate for? Do we meditate on
the aggregates of grasping for worldly wealth? For relief from illness?
For clairvoyance? For levitation and such supernatural powers? Insight
meditation aims at none of these. There have been cases of people who get
cured of serious illnesses as a result of meditational practice. In the
days of the Buddha persons who got perfected through insight meditation
had supernatural powers. People today may have such powers if they get
perfected. But fulfilment of these powers is not the basic aim of
insight meditation. Shall we meditate on phenomena past and
gone? Shall we meditate on phenomena not yet come? Shall we meditate on
the present phenomena? Or, shall we meditate on phenomena which are
neither past, future, nor present, but which we can imagine as we have
read about them in books? The answer to these questions is: we
meditate to not grasp and we meditate on what is arising. Yes, people not practised in meditation
grasp at the rising mind-and-matter every time they see, hear, touch, or
become aware of. They grasp at them with craving – are pleased with them.
They grasp at them with wrong views, as permanent, happy, as the I, the
ego. We meditate in order not to let these graspings arise, to be free
from them. This is the basic aim of insight meditation. And we meditate on what is arising. We do
not meditate on things past, future, or indefinite in time. Here we are
speaking of practical insight meditation. In inferential meditation we do
meditate on things past, future, and indefinite in time. Let me explain.
Insight meditation is of two kinds, practical and inferential. The
knowledge you gain by meditating on what actually arises by way of
characteristic, function and manifestation is practical insight. From this
practical knowledge you infer the impermanence, suffering and not-self of
things past and future, things you have not experienced. This is
inferential insight. "The fixing both (unseen and seen) as one
by following the object..." --
Patisambhida
The Path of Purity explains this statement
as follows: "....by following, going after the object
seen, visually determining both (the seen and unseen) as one in intrinsic
nature: 'as this (seen) one, so what goes as complex broke up in the past
and will break up in the future also'." --
Visuddhi-magga "The object seen"-- this is practical
insight. And "going after the object seen ... determining both ... in the
past ... in the future" -- this is inferential insight. But here note: the
inferential insight is possible only after the practical. No inference can
be made without first knowing the present. The same explanation is given
in the commentary on Kathavatthu.
"Seeing the impermanence of even one
formation, one draws the conclusion as regards the others, as 'impermanent
are all the things of life'." Why don't we meditate on things past or
future? Because they will not make you understand the real nature and
cleanse you of defilements. You do not remember your past existences. Even
in this existence, you do not remember most of your childhood. So,
meditating on things past, how can you know things as they really are with
their characteristics and functions? Things of the more recent past may be
recalled. But, as you recall them, you think, "I saw, I heard, I thought.
It was I who saw at that time and it is I who am seeing now." There is the
"I" notion for you. There can even be notions of permanence and happiness.
So recalling things past to meditate on do not serve our purpose, You have
grasped them and this grasping is hard to overcome. Although you look on
them as mind and matter with all your learning and thinking, the "I"
notion persists, because you have already grasped it. You say
"impermanent" on the one hand, you get the notion "permanent" on the
other. You note suffering, but the notion "happiness" keeps turning
up. You meditate on not-self, but the self notion remains strong
and firm. You argue with yourself. In the end your meditation has to give way
to your preconceived ideas. The future has not yet come, and you can't
be sure what exactly it will be like when it comes. You may have meditated
on them in advance but may fail to do so when they turn up. Then will
craving, wrong view, and defilements arise all anew. So, to meditate on
the future with the help of learning and thinking is no way to know things
as they really are. Nor is it the way to calm defilements. Things of indefinite time have never
existed, will not exist, and are not existing, in oneself or in others.
They are just imagined by learning and thinking. They are high-sounding
and look intellectual, but on reflection are found to be just concepts of
names, signs and shapes. Suppose someone is meditating, "Matter is
impermanent. Matter rises moment to moment and passes away moment to
moment." Ask him: What matter is it? Is it matter of the past or the
present or the future? Matter in oneself or in others? If in oneself, is
it matter in the head? The body? The limbs? The eye? The ear? You will
find that it is none of these but a mere concept, an imagination. So we do
not meditate on indefinite time. Origination But the present phenomenon is what comes
up at the six doors right now. It has not yet been defiled. It is like an
unsoiled piece of cloth or paper. If you are quick enough to meditate on
it just as it comes up, it will not be defiled. You fail to note it and it
gets defiled. Once defiled, it cannot be undefiled. If you fail to note
the mind-and-matter as it rises, grasping intervenes. There is grasping
with craving -- grasping of sense-desires. There is grasping with wrong
view -- grasping of wrong views, of mere rite and ritual, of a theory of
the self. What if grasping takes place? "Conditioned by grasping is becoming;
conditioned by becoming is birth; conditioned by birth, old age and dying,
grief, suffering, sorrow, despair and lamentation come into being. Thus
comes to be the origination of this entire mass of ill." --
Majjhima Nikaya i 333; Samyutta Nikaya ii
1-2. Grasping is no small matter. It is the
root-cause of good and bad deeds. One who is grasped works to accomplish
what he believes are good things. Everyone of us is doing what he thinks
is good.What makes him think it is good? It is grasping. Others may think
it is bad, but to the doer it is good. If he thinks it is not good, of
course he will not do it. There is a noteworthy passage in King Asoka's
inscriptions: "One thinks well of one's work. One never thinks evil of
one's work." A thief steals because it is good to him to steal. A robber
robs people because he thinks it is good to rob. A killer kills because he
thinks it is good to kill. Ajatasattu killed his own father, King
Bimbisara. He thought it was good. Devadatta conspired against the life of
the Buddha. Why, to him it was good. One who takes poison to kill himself
does so because he thinks it is good. Moths rush to a flame thinking it is
a very nice thing. All living things do what they do because they
think it is good to do so. To think it is good is grasping. Once you are
really grasped you do things. What is the outcome? Well, it is the
good deeds and the bad deeds. It is a good deed to refrain from causing
suffering to others. It is a good deed to render help to others. It is a
good deed to give. It is a good deed to pay respect to those to whom
respect is due. A good deed can bring about peace, a long life, and good
health in this very life. It will bring good results in future
lives, too. Such grasping is good, right grasping. Those who are thus
grasped do good deeds like giving and keeping precepts and cause thereby
to bring about good karma. What is the result then? "Conditioned by
becoming is birth." After death they are born anew. Where are they born?
In the Good Born, in the worlds of men and gods. As men they are endowed
with such good things as a long life, beauty, health, as well as good
birth, good following, and wealth. You can call them "happy people." As
gods, too, they will be attended by multitudes of gods and goddesses and
be living in magnificent palaces. They have been grasped by notions
of happiness and in a worldly sense, they can be said to be happy. But from the point of view of the Buddha's
teaching, these happy men and gods are not exempt from suffering.
"Conditioned by birth are old age and dying." Although born a happy man,
he will have to grow into an old "happy" man. Look at all those "happy"
old people in this world. Once over seventy or eighty, not everything is
all right with them. Grey hair, broken teeth, poor eye-sight, poor
hearing, backs bent double, wrinkles all over, energy all spent up, mere
good-for-nothings! With all their wealth and big names, these old men and
women, can they be happy? Then there is the disease of old age. They
cannot sleep well, they cannot eat well, they have difficulty sitting down
or getting up. And finally, they must die. Rich man, king, or man of
power, dies one day. He has nothing to rely on then. Friends and relatives
there are around him, but just as he is lying there on his death-bed he
closes his eyes and dies. Dying he goes away all alone to another
existence. He must find it really hard to part with all his wealth. If he
is not a man of good deeds he will be worried about his future existence. The great god, likewise, has to die. Gods
too are not spared. A week before they die, five signs appear to them. The
flowers they wear which never faded now begin to fade. Their dresses which
never got worn-out now appear worn-out. Sweat comes out in their armpits,
an unusual thing. Their bodies which always looked young now look old.
Having never felt bored in their divine lives, they now feel bored. When
these five signs appear, they at once realize their imminent death, and
are greatly alarmed. In the days of the Buddha, the Sakka, (King of
the gods) himself had these signs appear to him. Greatly alarmed that
he was going to die and lose his glory, he came to the Buddha for help.
The Buddha preached the dhamma to him and he became a
stream-winner. The old Sakka died and a new Sakka was reborn. It was lucky of him that the Buddha was
there to save him. Had it not been for the Buddha, it would have been a
disaster to the old great god. Not only old age and dying "... grief,
suffering, sorrow, despair and lamentation come into being." All these are
sufferings. "Thus comes to be the origination of this entire mass of ill."
So, the good life resulting from grasping is dreadful suffering after all.
Men or gods, all have to suffer. If the good life resulting from good deeds
is suffering, had we better not do them? No. If we do not do good deeds,
bad deeds may come up. These can lead us to hell, to the realm of animals,
to the realm of ghosts. The sufferings of these lower planes are far
worse. Human and divine life is suffering compared with the happiness of
deathless Nirvana but compared with the sufferings of the lower states,
human or divine life is happiness indeed. Right grasping gives rise to good deeds.
Likewise wrong grasping gives rise to bad deeds. Thinking that it
is good to do so, some kill, steal, rob, do wrong to others. As a result
they are reborn in bad bourn -- in hell, in the realm of animals, in the
realm of ghosts. To be reborn in hell is like jumping into a great fire.
Even a great god can do nothing against hell fire. In the days of the
Buddha there was a great mara-god by the name of Dusi. He was contemptuous
of the Buddha and the members of the holy Order. One day he caused the
death of an arahat. As a result of this cruel deed the great god died and
was reborn in Avici hell. Once there he was at the mercy of the guardians
of purgatory. Those people who are bullying others in this world will meet
the same fate as that met by the great god Dusi one day. Then, after
suffering for a long time in hell, they will be reborn animals and ghosts. How grasping arises So grasping is dreadful. It is very
important too. We meditate to let this grasping not be, to put an end to
it. We meditate not to grasp with craving or wrong view, not to grasp as
permanent or happy, not to grasp as self, ego, the I. Those who fail to
meditate grasp whenever they see, hear, feel or perceive. Ask yourselves
if you don't grasp. The answer will be too obvious. Let's begin with seeing. Suppose you see
something beautiful. What do you think of it? You are delighted with it,
pleased with it, aren't you? You won't say, "I don't want to see, I don't
want to look at it." In fact, you are thinking, "What a beautiful thing!
How lovely!" Beaming with smiles you are pleased with it. At the same time
you are thinking it is permanent. Whether the object seen is a human being
or an inanimate thing, you think it has existed before, exists now, and
will go on existing for ever. Although it is not your own, you mentally
take possession of it and delight in it. If it is a piece of clothing, you
mentally put it on and are pleased. If it is a pair of sandals, you
mentally put them on. If it is a human being, you mentally use him or her
and are pleased, too. The same thing happens when you hear,
smell, taste or touch. You take pleasure on each occasion. With thoughts
the range of your delights is far wider. You fancy and take delight in
things not your own, long for them, and imagine them to be yours. If they
are your own things, needless to say, you keep thinking of them and are
pleased with them all the time. We meditate to check such taking delights
in and graspings. We grasp with wrong views, too. You grasp with the
personality view. When you see, you think what you see is a person, an
ego. Your own consciousness of seeing, too, you take as a person, an ego.
Without a thorough insight knowledge we grasp at things the moment we see
them. Think of yourselves and you will see for yourselves how you have got
such grasping in you. You think of yourself as well as of others as an ego
that has lived the whole life long. In reality there is no such thing.
Nothing lives the whole life long. Only mind and matter rising one after
another in continuation. This mind-and-matter you take as person, ego, and
grasp. We meditate to not let these graspings with wrong views be. But we have to meditate on things as they
come up. Only then will we be able to prevent the graspings. Graspings
come from seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching and thinking. They
come from six places -- six doors. Can we cling to things we cannot see?
No. Can we cling to those we cannot hear? No. The Buddha himself has asked
these questions. "Now what think you, Malunkya's son? As to
those shapes cognizable by eye, which you have not seen, which you have
never seen before, which you do not see now, which you have no desire to
see in future, -- have you any partiality, any passion, any affection for
such shapes?" "Not so, my lord." --
Samyutta Nikaya iv. 72
What are those shapes you have not seen
before? Towns and villages and countries you have never been to, men and
women living there, and other scenes. How can anyone fall in love with men
and women he or she hasn't ever seen? How can you cling to them? So, you
do not cling to things you have never seen. No defilements arise in
respect of them. You do not need to meditate on them. But things you see
are another matter. Defilements can arise -- that is to say, if you fail
to meditate to prevent them. The same is true of things heard, smelled,
tasted, touched, thought on. -ooOoo-
Top of Page | Part 1 | Part 2 |
Vietnamese
Trở về
trang Thư Mục Chân thành cám ơn Bác
Phạm Kim Khánh đã gửi tặng bản điện tử (Bình Anson, 05-2003)
This document is written in Vietnamese, with Unicode Times
font
(When he walks, he is aware "I am walking.")
last updated: 01-06-2003